A ski festival is good, but does it have to cost so much?
“It would be boring if you could never have a party! The challenge is to do it in a way that the cost is in a reasonable proportion to the benefit to society,” says researcher Denis Becker about the 2025 World Ski Championships in Trondheim.
Researchers at the NTNU Business School have taken a careful look into why many large sports events often cost more than expected. They have some ideas about how these overruns can be avoided. You can read more about that lower in the article.
Festivals have great value
If we turn the dial back to 1997 and the last time Trondheim hosted the World Ski Championships, there was a fair amount of scepticism before the event. But what a festival it was!
Trondheim also hosted the major sailing regatta Cutty Sark and the city celebrated its 1000th anniversary that same year.
All of this contributed to upgrading areas of the city, and an increased use of the city by residents, says Harry Arne Solberg, a professor at NTNU’s Business School.
This year’s World Ski Championships look to be a huge public celebration, which can be an important psychological benefit, he said.
- You might also like: The magic behind the medals
Must weigh the costs
The fact that a sporting event costs a lot of money is not in itself a problem, Becker said.
But the cost should be considered as early as during the application process, where the costs are weighed against the societal benefit compared to other, perhaps less spectacular, but important purposes.
The money should logically be spent where it provides the most benefit, Becker said.
He adds that cost overruns are not necessarily a problem in themselves, as long as they do not come at the expense of other important societal needs, such as kindergartens, elderly care and other critical infrastructure.
Becker compares the decision making to a person’s night on the town that doesn’t necessarily end the way it was planned.
“If I go to the city to meet friends and end up drinking seven beers instead of three, and taking a taxi home instead of the bus, maybe I should have foreseen it, since has happened many times before,” he said.
“I may regret it when I see my bank statement the next day, but I am the one who is responsible for my choices. Does the same apply to sports events?” he said rhetorically.
Reuse of existing facilities
Illustration showing the newly rebuilt ski jump at the World Championships arena at Granåsen. Illustration: Asplan Viak
One of the researchers’ suggestions is to spread the different races and activities for large sports events across several facilities in the region or in the country.
This allows existing facilities to be reused, and avoids the expense of new facilities.
For example, the ski jumping events for the World Championships could have been held at Holmenkollen on the outskirts of Oslo, or in Lillehammer, where there are facilities from the 1994 Winter Olympics. The other events could have then been held in Trondheim, Solberg said.
Holmenkollen was given a major upgrade before the World Ski Championships in Oslo in 2011. It cost a whopping NOK 1.825 billion or about EUR 156 million, which caused a great deal of debate when the bill landed with the Oslo municipality.
The international ski federation FIS demanded this comprehensive upgrade. However, the event itself made a solid profit, but the investments were far higher than planned.
The researchers have been studying the World Ski Championships in Oslo among others to understand why major events often cost far more than budgeted.
- You might also like: Running rats and healing hearts
White elephants
Norway has about 300 ski jumpers who are qualified to use the nation’s large ski jumping hills. It is not certain that the new ski jumping facility at Granåsen will have such great general utility value after the World Ski Championships, Solberg said.
Professor Harry Arne Solberg (left) and Associate Professor Denis Becker. Foto: Idun Haugan / NTNU
Sports economists call facilities with excess capacity “white elephants”. A white elephant is something that costs more to operate and maintain than it manages to bring in in terms of income or benefit. The expression originates from white elephants in Southeast Asia that were seen as sacred animals and could therefore neither be put to work nor removed.
The costs for Trondheim’s Spektrum, a 12,000 seat concert hall and arena, and the ski jumping hill in Granåsen are relatively similar. Spektrum is used for international championships, but also almost 24/7 by grassroots sports teams. The ski jump, in contrast, is used daily by a few athletes. A swimming pool would also be of far greater benefit to the local population than the ski jump, Solberg said.
“On the other hand, only large sports events like the World Championships provide an opportunity to upgrade large facilities, such as the Granåsen ski jump,” he added.
- You might also like: How can deficits be avoided at major sporting events?
The math
The company Ski-VM Trondheim 2025 is responsible for the implementation of the championship itself. The development of the facility in Granåsen, which has laid the foundation for such a large championship to be organized in Trondheim, is the responsibility of the municipality, county and national government.
The Granåsen facility has cost NOK 1.7 billion, or roughly EUR 145 million.
This total includes the construction of the normal and large slopes with associated facilities, the joint building at the ski jumps, a biathlon facility, roller ski trails, the top sports centre, the stadium facility at the cross-country arena, a new ski bridge, buildings for operations and machinery, supply roads and the football hall between the main road and the ski resorts, according to the regional newspaper Adresseavisen (in Norwegian).
The big ski jumps at Granåsen ski arena, ready for use. Photo: Denis Becker/NTNU
The state has contributed almost NOK 500 million (EUR 42 million), while NOK 51.5 million (EUR4.4 million) came from lottery sales (Norwegian betting). Trøndelag County has provided NOK 10 million (EUR 856,000). Trondheim municipality has provided NOK 1.1 billion (EUR 94 million).
Research on the 2025 Ski World Championships
Researchers will collect more concrete knowledge about the Ski World Championships in Trondheim through a research project on the event. The Ministry of Education and Research has allocated money for the research project, which you can read more about here: Project description KUD (in Norwegian).
Here's what the researchers are studying now
1) Measure the financial contribution to the city (e.g. from visitors, external sponsors, etc.)
2) The budget process.
3) Psychological safety: Document the challenges of being part of an organization where many inexperienced people are involved. Events like the World Cup stand out from annual events like the St. Olavs Festival, where the project organization brings with it experiences from year to year.
4) The psychological effect for local residents, such as enthusiasm, pride and the like.
The challenge
Implementing and holding a major sports event is a complex task with many players and moving pieces.
Becker points out that many of the actors have room to manoeuvre to spend money that they do not have to contribute themselves, they can make demands that they do not have to finance themselves, or they can dispose of funds from others without sufficient control from those who actually own the funds (such as society at large, or taxpayers).
“This can lead to overspending and a lack of cost control, which creates financial challenges as well as arguments and disappointment related to who pays the bill,” Becker said.
The solution
To counter these challenges, the researchers propose establishing an expertise bank that will ensure the systematic transfer of experience and knowledge.
A shared body of information can help developers avoid repeating previous mistakes, reduce the risk of pitfalls and provide better control over both processes and costs.
The researchers recommend that this expertise bank be managed by an independent institution, which could include the following tasks:
* Counter strategic budgeting, where cost estimates are kept artificially low to ensure events are allocated to cities where the costs “appear” to be low but may not be.
* Promote collaboration with other applicant cities, which can make it more difficult for the international federations to play applicant cities off against each other in bidding wars.
* Assess whether the use of resources on sports events provides a risk-adjusted societal value that is greater than or equal to the best alternative use of the funds.
* Ensure that the allocation of events prioritizes destinations that have a competitive advantage, such as awarding a winter championship event to a winter sports destination.
* Implement risk and profit sharing mechanisms, so that organizers take greater responsibility for financial uncertainties.
While risks associated with major sporting events cannot be eliminated, strategies like these can contribute to more realistic and responsible budgets, the researchers said.
References: Harry Arne Solberg & Jon Martin Denstadli: Psychic income and monetary support for hosting major sport events, Managing Sport and Leisure, February 2025
Denis Mike Becker, Harry Arne Solberg & Gaute Slåen Heyerdahl: The financial challenges of hosting sports events: a problem of insufficient separation between decision-making and decision-control, European Sport Management Quarterly, March 2022
Jon Martin Denstadli & Harry Arne Solberg: I want to ride my bicycle! Or not? Health and transportation legacies of the 2017 World Road Cycling Championship, European Sport Management Quarterly, January, 2021
